ecial cases where for instance a table is in a header or
> footer
> %D line and we have a split table in progress. (See mail to list from Taco.)
>
> \unexpanded\def\bTABLEnested{\tabl_ntb_next_level\bTABLE}
> \unexpanded\def\eTABLEnested{\eTA
puzzled because nesting shoudl kind of work)
I'll add this:
%D This is for the special cases where for instance a table is in a
header or footer
%D line and we have a split table in progress. (See mail to list from Taco.)
\unexpanded\def\bTABLEnested{\tabl_ntb_next_level\bTABLE}
\unexpanded\def
> Hi,
>
> Please see the attached example. The \bTABLE in the footer of the page
> ‘inherits' the
> first line of the split \bTABLE in the running text. I have no idea how to
> fix this
> or why this even happens. Help!
>
> I’ll need a way to work around t
Hi,
Please see the attached example. The \bTABLE in the footer of the page
‘inherits' the
first line of the split \bTABLE in the running text. I have no idea how to fix
this
or why this even happens. Help!
I’ll need a way to work around this problem in my current ConTeXt installation
I try make a table with some random numbers but I found a problem with this
code:
\starttext
\ctxluacode{v=math.random(400,600)/10;context(%0.1f,v) ;}
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD Distance (cm) \eTD\bTD $\Delta t$ (s) \eTD\eTR
\bTR\bTD[nr=3] \ctxluacode{v=math.random(400,600)/10;context(%0.1f,v) ;}
\eTD
Hi Jorge,
···date: 2013-11-27, Wednesday···from: DesdeChaves···
I try make a table with some random numbers but I found a problem with this
code:
\starttext
\ctxluacode{v=math.random(400,600)/10;context(%0.1f,v) ;}
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD Distance (cm) \eTD\bTD $\Delta t$ (s) \eTD\eTR
\bTR
\def \getrandomnumber#1#2#3 {\ctxluacode {document.get_random_number
(#1,#2,#3)}}
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD Distance (cm) \eTD \bTD $\Delta t$ (s) \eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD[nr=3] \getrandomnumber{34,56,10} \eTD \bTD t1
\eTD \eTR
\bTR
,max,delta)
context (%0.1f, mathrandom (min, max) / decimal)
end
\stopluacode
\def \getrandomnumber#1#2#3 {\ctxluacode {document.get_random_number
(#1,#2,#3)}}
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR \bTD Distance (cm) \eTD \bTD $\Delta t$ (s) \eTD
Hi Wolfgang,
hm, I see, that I did not read your first message correctly. Thank you for
pointing me to it!
Willi
On Mar 19, 2013, at 8:23 AM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 17.03.2013 um 22:58 schrieb Willi Egger cont...@boede.nl:
Thank you again!
Sorry for misspelling your name Aditya!
Am 17.03.2013 um 22:58 schrieb Willi Egger cont...@boede.nl:
Thank you again!
Sorry for misspelling your name Aditya!
I was surprised, that the solution of Wolfgang does not work, with
\expanded{\recurselevel}, though it sounds reasonable. Still all rows are
marked 0. Alan's
Dear all,
I should prepare a form with a table. The table rows should be numbered.
How can I get get this done by using \recurselevel.
In the attached minimal example all rows are numbered with 0.
\starttext
\subject{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3
\subject{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3}
{\bTR
\bTD \recurselevel \eTD
\eTR}
\eTABLE
What do i do wrongly here?
\starttext
\subject{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3
{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3}
{\bTR
\bTD \recurselevel \eTD
\eTR}
\eTABLE
What do i do wrongly here?
You’re doing nothing wrong but you have to expand the value of the counter.
One feature of natural tables
are numbered with 0.
\starttext
\subject{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3}
{\bTR
\bTD \recurselevel \eTD
\eTR}
\eTABLE
What do i do wrongly here?
You’re doing nothing wrong but you have to expand the value
. The table rows should be numbered.
How can I get get this done by using \recurselevel.
In the attached minimal example all rows are numbered with 0.
\starttext
\subject{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3}
{\bTR
\bTD \recurselevel
.
In the attached minimal example all rows are numbered with 0.
\starttext
\subject{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3}
{\bTR
\bTD \recurselevel \eTD
\eTR}
\eTABLE
What do i do wrongly here?
You’re doing nothing wrong but you have to expand
. The table rows should be numbered.
How can I get get this done by using \recurselevel.
In the attached minimal example all rows are numbered with 0.
\starttext
\subject{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3}
{\bTR
\bTD \recurselevel \eTD
\eTR
.
In the attached minimal example all rows are numbered with 0.
\starttext
\subject{bTABLE--eTABLE: recurse creates rows}
\bTABLE
\dorecurse{3}
{\bTR
\bTD \recurselevel \eTD
\eTR}
\eTABLE
What do i do wrongly here?
You’re doing nothing wrong
On 21-6-2012 05:49, Hongwen Qiu wrote:
The bTABLE is still broken in latest beta. Minimal example:
\starttext
\setupTABLE[c][each][width=1cm]
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD Test \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
fixed ... thanks for testing
The bTABLE is still broken in latest beta. Minimal example:
\starttext
\setupTABLE[c][each][width=1cm]
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD Test \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
Error log:
! Missing number, treated as zero.
system tex error on line 5 in file test.tex: Missing
number, treated as zero
Am 10.06.2012 um 12:19 schrieb Sido Jensma:
This is the first time I am posting here. I am not really sure what a typical
bug report should look like.
I had posted a question on stack-exchange and it was suggested to post a bug
report here. I’m not sure if this is a bug, but it was
Sido wrote:
I had posted a question on stack-exchange and it was suggested to
post a bug report here. I’m not sure if this is a bug, but it was
unexpected behavior to me.
Wolfgang wrote:
BTW: Please use next time the normal mailing list for such problems and not
the developer list.
That
Hi all,
I need to use the background mechanism to draw a thicker line in a
bTABLE...eTABLE setup together with MKII.
It looks like that there is a bug somewhere in this. I am unable to draw the
line at the top of the cell. However it is possible to draw a diagonal through
the cel. I think
On Wed, Aug 04 2010, Willi Egger wrote:
Please refer to the attached test file.
Hello Willi,
Here some workaround:
\startuniqueMPgraphic{Topline}
path p,q;
p := unitsquare xscaled \overlaywidth yscaled \overlayheight;
draw urcorner p -- ulcorner p withpen pencircle
Hi Peter,
thanks for this rapid reply! Though not nice, it works!
Willi
On 4 Aug 2010, at 09:32, Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04 2010, Willi Egger wrote:
Please refer to the attached test file.
Hello Willi,
Here some workaround:
\startuniqueMPgraphic{Topline}
path p,q;
Hi Willi,
Am 04.08.2010 08:57, schrieb Willi Egger:
Hi all,
I need to use the background mechanism to draw a thicker line in a
bTABLE...eTABLE setup together with MKII.
It looks like that there is a bug somewhere in this. I am unable to draw the
line at the top of the cell. However
a thicker line in a
bTABLE...eTABLE setup together with MKII.
It looks like that there is a bug somewhere in this. I am unable to draw the
line at the top of the cell. However it is possible to draw a diagonal
through the cel. I think that the problem is related to the background
mechanism
Hi,
the content (word Umfang) of the the (nr=2) first row of this
example should but turned +90°.
Hmm ... just how to rotate the content of a cell?
Thanks,
Steffen
===
\starttext
\bTABLE[align={middle,lohi}]
\bTR
\bTD[nr=2] {\bf Umfang} \eTD
\bTD Absolut\eTD
\bTD
Am 03.10.2008 um 14:43 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Hi,
the content (word Umfang) of the the (nr=2) first row of this
example should but turned +90°.
Hmm ... just how to rotate the content of a cell?
Thanks,
Steffen
===
\starttext
\bTABLE[align={middle,lohi}]
\bTR
\bTD[nr=2
\bTABLE[align={middle,lohi}]
\bTR
\bTD[nr=2] {\bf Umfang} \eTD
\bTD[nr=2,orientation=90,foregroundstyle=bold] Umfang \eTD
no, this gives an error:
systems : end file DH_project at line 3
(/usr/local/texlive/2008/../texmf-local/tex/context/base/page-run.tex
loading
of a cell?
Thanks,
Steffen
===
\starttext
\bTABLE[align={middle,lohi}]
\bTR
\bTD[nr=2] {\bf Umfang} \eTD
\bTD[nr=2,orientation=90,foregroundstyle=bold] Umfang \eTD
no, this gives an error:
systems : end file DH_project at line 3
(/usr/local/texlive/2008/../texmf-local
but turned +90°.
Hmm ... just how to rotate the content of a cell?
Thanks,
Steffen
===
\starttext
\bTABLE[align={middle,lohi}]
\bTR
\bTD[nr=2] {\bf Umfang} \eTD
\bTD[nr=2,orientation=90,foregroundstyle=bold] Umfang \eTD
no, this gives an error:
systems : end file
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Alan BRASLAU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not understood how tables and \chemical interact.
The second case in the minimal example below
demonstrates unexpected/incorrect centering
when using \chemical and \bTABLE.
Am I missing something?
Thanks.
Alan
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 08:33:19 Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
\dontleavehmode\startchemical
Thank you. This works, of course.
I suppose that it is a subtlety why this is
necessary with \bTable but not with \starttable...
Should this perhaps be included in \startchemical
or would that wreak
I have not understood how tables and \chemical interact.
The second case in the minimal example below
demonstrates unexpected/incorrect centering
when using \chemical and \bTABLE.
Am I missing something?
Thanks.
Alan
\starttext
\usemodule[chemic]
\setupchemical[size=small,scale=200,width=fit
Hello,
this is a repost, because I've the feeling, that this question got perhaps
unread:
What is the difference between distance and columndistance?
I thought the one was just a synonym for the other, but now I see, that you
treat them differently in your patch.
Cheers, Peter
--
� wrote:
Hello,
this is a repost, because I've the feeling, that this question got perhaps
unread:
What is the difference between distance and columndistance?
I thought the one was just a synonym for the other, but now I see, that you
treat them differently in your patch.
i forgot -)
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello,
when using \bTABLE[distance=...], the table gets wider than the textwidth.
A workaround seems to be textwidth=\dimexpr\textwidth-3em\relax
Could this be done automatically?
I expect it can (and should) be. Stuff sticking out in the margin
is always bad
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Peter M�nster wrote:
Hello,
when using \bTABLE[distance=...], the table gets wider than the textwidth.
A workaround seems to be textwidth=\dimexpr\textwidth-3em\relax
Could this be done automatically?
I expect it can (and should) be. Stuff
Hans Hagen wrote:
Could this be done automatically?
I expect it can (and should) be. Stuff sticking out in the margin
is always bad ;-)
% test: \advance\!!dimena-\gettbldis\recurselevel\relax
you can enable that line in core-ntb and see what happens
works for me ... Peter?
Taco
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
% test: \advance\!!dimena-\gettbldis\recurselevel\relax
you can enable that line in core-ntb and see what happens
works for me ... Peter?
Yes, thanks! But the next issues follow immediately:
just consider leftmargindistance= and
� wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
% test: \advance\!!dimena-\gettbldis\recurselevel\relax
you can enable that line in core-ntb and see what happens
works for me ... Peter?
Yes, thanks! But the next issues follow immediately:
just consider
Hello,
when using \bTABLE[distance=...], the table gets wider than the textwidth.
Example:
\starttext
\input tufte
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD bla bla bla bla\eTD\bTD
\input tufte
\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\bTABLE[distance=3em]
\bTR\bTD bla bla bla bla\eTD\bTD
\input tufte
\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\input tufte
\stoptext
Poltawskiego is remarkably readable even at that size.
Regards, Johan
\setuppapersize[A6][A6]
\setupbodyfont[6pt]
\starttext
\bTABLE[split=repeat]
\bTR\bTD aa\eTD
\bTD aa\eTD
\bTD aa\eTD
\bTD aa\eTD\eTR
\bTR\bTD aa\eTD
\bTD aa\eTD
\bTD aa\eTD
\bTD aa\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
to have the desired effect.
Thanks in advance,
Mark Pearson
\starttext
\start
\setupTABLE[r][1][height=1.5\lineheight]
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
Cell 1
\eTD
\bTD
Cell 2
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\stop
\blank[2*big]
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
This is a table cell with a long section
,
Mark Pearson
\starttext
\setupTABLE[r][1][height=1.5\lineheight]
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
Cell 1
\eTD
\bTD
Cell 2
\eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
\blank[2*big]
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD
This is a table cell with a long section of text in it which I
sincerely hope is going to force the table to resize accordingly
of space
1.2.) \bTABLE ... \eTABLE seems too complicated to me to be used for
such a simple thing as asking for a paragraph of a certain width,
centered with regard to the current line.
as always, it's \framed that does the trick:
\input tufte \framed[location=middle,align=center]{what
Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
It may actually be that the penalty for an underfull box is bigger
than for the overfull one. This explains strange placing of the
numbers then.
let's eee what taco says ... our tex source magician may knows the
dirty details
lines that cannot
, \sbox, \tbox,
\bbox on page 106 of cont-eni.pdf. But if I understand it properly,
there's no alternative to LaTeX \parbox command.
1.1.) After grep-ing the LaTeX tree for \parbox, my disk ran out of space
1.2.) \bTABLE ... \eTABLE seems too complicated to me to be used for
such a simple thing
[c][1,2][align=lohi] % to center vertically (any better way?)
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD
a midaligned parbox:
\eTD\bTD[offset=0pt,width=1em] % 1em wide paragraph
1 2 3
\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
%%
My ConTeXt version is 2005.06.27.
See the vcenter-context-old.png for the result.
The strange thing
][align=lohi] % to center vertically (any better way?)
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD[offset=0pt,width=0.5em] % 1em wide paragraph
1\ 2\ 3\
\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
Hello,
On the wiki (http://contextgarden.net/Vertically_centred) a while ago
someone asked how to do the following in ConTeXt
Elena Fraboschi wrote:
My guess is that there is a built-in bias not to split a line
but, rather, give you an overfull \hbox. I forced the
issue by defining each column to be less than 1em (because 1
is a very narrow char that surely takes less than 1 em), and
by adding a typescript space
:
%%
\setupTABLE[frame=on] % only for debugging reasons
\setupTABLE[c][1,2][align=lohi] % to center vertically (any better way?)
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD
a midaligned parbox:
\eTD\bTD[offset=0pt,width=1em] % 1em wide paragraph
1 2 3
\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
%%
so, in order to compare, use 1\\2\\3 here too
for debugging reasons
\setupTABLE[c][each][align=lohi] % to center vertically (any better way?)
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD[offset=0pt,width=0.5em] % 1em wide paragraph
1\ 2\ 3\
\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
Hello,
On the wiki (http://contextgarden.net/Vertically_centred) a while ago
someone asked how
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
It may actually be that the penalty for an underfull box is bigger
than for the overfull one. This explains strange placing of the
numbers then.
let's eee what taco says ... our tex source magician may knows the
dirty details
... but in the latest ConTeXt version
Hi all,
I have problem with the background of some text inisde bTABLE cell. The
input file is in my case some common XML, so inside table cell various
paragraph elements appear. That is why I cannot simple set up background for
cell itself.
The problem is that the background does not fit
with multiple lines
2. there is a cell that spans several columns.
Is there a workaround?
Regards, Johan
\starttext
{\startlocalfootnotes[n=0, location={text, none}]
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD \input knuth \footnote{C1}\eTD\bTD A\footnote{C1}\eTD\bTD\eTD\eTR
\bTR\bTD[nx=2] A\footnote{A2}\eTD\bTD A\eTD\eTR
Johan Sandblom, April 25:
Reading earlier messages on this list I hoped the following
would work for natural tables as well. It does not, the table
ends up unsplit. What am I doing wrong?
I'm not sure you can use natural tables for this. This works:
\splitfloat
{\placetable{Title}}
, but the
will to find out, which is the exact opposite
-- Bertrand Russell
- Original Message -
From: Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 3:11 pm
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] \splitfloat and \bTABLE do not play well?
Johan Sandblom, April 25:
Reading earlier messages
Reading earlier messages on this list I hoped the following
would work for natural tables as well. It does not, the table
ends up unsplit. What am I doing wrong?
\starttext
\splitfloat
[lines=3, conversion=greek]
{\placetable{test}}
{\bTABLE[split=repeat]
\bTR \bTD a \eTD\bTH b \eTH
How does one get footnotes in a long natural table?
The following gives error
\starttext
\startlocalfootnotes[n=0, location={text, none}]
\bTABLE[split=repeat]
\bTR\bTD a\footnote{test} \eTD\bTD b \eTD\eTR
\dorecurse{50}{\bTR\bTD \eTD\bTD \eTD\eTR}
\eTABLE
\placelocalfootnotes
, but the
will to find out, which is the exact opposite
-- Bertrand Russell
- Original Message -
From: Johan Sandblom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, April 25, 2005 2:07 pm
Subject: [NTG-context] footnotes in multipage \bTABLE
How does one get footnotes in a long natural table?
The following
Zyka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, April 22, 2005 8:25 pm
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] arranging + multipage \bTABLE + transparent color
= bug?
luigi.scarso wrote:
Johan Sandblom wrote:
The following code compiles flawlessly but the pdf that is
generated
opens with the error Could
\setuppapersize [A6][A4] \setuparranging [2*4, doublesided]
%\setuppapersize [A6][A6]
\setupcolors[state=start]
\definecolor[tgray][s=.8, t=.5, a=1]
\starttext
\bTABLE[split=repeat, frame=off, background=color, backgroundcolor=tgray]
\dorecurse{200}{\bTR\bTD 1\eTD\bTD 2\eTD\eTR
luigi.scarso wrote:
Johan Sandblom wrote:
The following code compiles flawlessly but the pdf that is generated
opens with the error Could not find the Extended Graphics State named
'Tr1'.
See the thread
http://archive.contextgarden.net/search/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:arranging,sb:pages,sb:with.html
: Friday, April 22, 2005 5:42 pm
Subject: Re: [NTG-context] arranging + multipage \bTABLE + transparent color
= bug?
Johan Sandblom wrote:
The following code compiles flawlessly but the pdf that is
generated opens
with the error Could not find the Extended Graphics State named
'Tr1
Johan Sandblom wrote:
Mine is
Did you compile the document with
texexec --arrange --pdf ?
Ok, now I can confirm your bug.
luigi
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
][A4] \setuparranging [2*4, doublesided]
%\setuppapersize [A6][A6]
\setupcolors[state=start]
\definecolor[tgray][s=.8, t=.5, a=1]
\starttext
\bTABLE[split=repeat, frame=off, background=color, backgroundcolor=tgray]
\dorecurse{200}{\bTR\bTD 1\eTD\bTD 2\eTD\eTR}
\eTABLE
\stoptext
Hello,
there's a very comical behavior of \type{sometextfollowedby_underscore}
inside \bTABLE and \eTABLE. For example:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD \type{a_b} \eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
\type{_} or \type{_b} work OK, \type{a_b} outside the table works OK as
well.
---
I tried to find \def
Hello,
I tried to find \def\type in ConTeXt source, but I couldn't and I'm
also not advanced enough to interpret the error message below. Any
ideas?
http://source.contextgarden.net/core-mis.tex#simplifycommands
see also recent thread:
Patrick Gundlach wrote:
I tried to find \def\type in ConTeXt source, but I couldn't and I'm
also not advanced enough to interpret the error message below. Any
ideas?
http://source.contextgarden.net/core-mis.tex#simplifycommands
see also recent thread:
Willi Egger wrote:
argument \@@tblprefix \c!each
should be v!each
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038
}\ifautoTBLspread
\checktb...
...
l.14 \eTABLE
Kind regards Willi
% Bug?
% CONTEXT file
% filename table.tex
% Willi Egger
% 15-01-2005
\setupoutput[pdftex]
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR
\bTD Document: \eTD
\eTR
\eTABLE
Hi all.
I have the following code, used to set quotations with over-large quote
marks either side. I use the bTABLE/eTABLE model because it is easy, and
because it allows for the variable width of the quotation part (the
middle column) and for it to carry over into multiple lines.
When
All,
I thought the following long table would split but it doesn't seem to
using the current beta. Am I missing something?
\starttext
This is a test of the \type{\TABLE} environment.
\bTABLE[split=yes]
\bTABLEhead
\bTR \bTH Head 1 \eTH \bTH Head 2 \eTH \eTR
\eTABLEhead
\bTABLEfoot
\bTR \bTH Foot
At 16:50 01/06/2004, you wrote:
All,
I thought the following long table would split but it doesn't seem to
using the current beta. Am I missing something?
\starttext
This is a test of the \type{\TABLE} environment.
\bTABLE[split=yes]
\bTABLEhead
\bTR \bTH Head 1 \eTH \bTH Head 2 \eTH \eTR
On 1 Jun 2004, at 18:18, Hans Hagen wrote:
split=repeat
splitmethod=a|b
\bTABLE[split=repeat] % works
\setupTABLE[split=repeat] % does not work which was not so obvious (to
me!)
I haven't worked out what the difference between splitmethod=a ,
splitmethod=b and nothing is.
Thanks very much
the nested table part fails.
I would be greatful if you could investigate thie again.
Best wishes Willi
Hans Hagen wrote:
At 09:16 12/12/2003, you wrote:
Is there something changed in the bTABLE-eTABLE environment?
ah .. i changed the default \push \pop macro's, so now i need global
ones
.
Is there something changed in the bTABLE-eTABLE environment?
only multiple split strategies were added (with repeated headlines and
alternate headlines) ... i'll look into it, has to do with nested tables
Hans
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL
79 matches
Mail list logo
